Your mass distribution is a bit problematic. Remember we were talking about a gradient in the distribution of Mass: Massive on the Bottom and getting more and more light on the top. Also do not connect the spikes on the top. They have to look more like poles or hairs. The proportion I guess coud be 1/4 mass to 3/4 spike. Also separate the spikes a bit from each other, it still looks too much like the skeleton of a ahighriser......here a couple of reference images...not to copy, just to check relations between object and spike, mass vs finesse of thin spikes etc....highriser.http://www.landschaftsfotos.eu/bilder/genfer-see-3932.jpg
Your mass distribution is a bit problematic. Remember we were talking about a gradient in the distribution of Mass: Massive on the Bottom and getting more and more light on the top. Also do not connect the spikes on the top. They have to look more like poles or hairs. The proportion I guess coud be 1/4 mass to 3/4 spike. Also separate the spikes a bit from each other, it still looks too much like the skeleton of a ahighriser......here a couple of reference images...not to copy, just to check relations between object and spike, mass vs finesse of thin spikes etc....highriser.http://www.landschaftsfotos.eu/bilder/genfer-see-3932.jpg
ReplyDelete